The Inverse Anthropic Principle

In the Middle Age, official science said wrongly we are in a very special location, but now it says we are living a special epoch. Indeed, in the famous article of Carr and Rees, 'The anthropic principle and the structure of the physical world', published by Nature (278, 605-612 (1979)) one reads “All these scales can be deduced directly from known physics except the mass and length scale of the Universe, which depends on the age of the Universe being A times the electron timescale 1.2881 10^-21 second”. A is the quantum gravitational pure number: 1.6929 10^38. Now, the point is that, apart a 2 factor, this formula corresponds to the so-called 'universe age' 13.80 billion years of the Planck mission (March 2013), in its subpercent undeterminacy of 40 million years. This means dinosorians have not got our chance to live a so particular epoch. Moreover Eddington's fundamental Theory contains this formula, including the 2 factor, among other so-called 'free parameters' of the current cosmology: this refutes the Primordial Big Bang, and its fatal consequence, the controversial Multiverse, http://viXra.org/abs/1403.0309. How such a so ridiculous idea emerged is detailed now in the following. The term "anthropic principle" first appeared in a symposium honoring Copernicus. Brandon Carter disagreed with using the Copernican principle to justify the Perfect Cosmological Principle, which states that all large regions and times in the universe must be statistically identical. The latter principle underlay the steady-state model, which is said to be falsified by the 1965 discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB). This discovery was claimed to be the unequivocal evidence that the universe has changed radically over time (for example, via the the Primordial Big Bang model). These arguments receives severe objections, as detailed below